Knowledge will forever govern
          ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors, 
          must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives.
          A popular government without popular information or the means of
          acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy or perhaps
          both.  -- James
          Madison --
      
    
    
    
    
    
auf Deutsch:
        http://wkeim.bplaced.net/if-ngo.htm
      
    Walter Keim, Email: walter.keim@gmail.com
      
      Torshaugv. 2 C 
      N-7020 Trondheim, 26. January 2012
      
    
    To: 
      Transparency, Deutsche Gesellschaft für
      Informationsfreiheit, Aktionsbündnis Informationsfreiheit für Bayern,
      Greenpeace, Humanistische Union, netzwerk recherche, Mehr Demokratie, German Institute for Human Rights, foianet@foiadvocates.info,
      fragdenstaat@lists.okfn.org,
      okfn-de@lists.okfn.org,
      Open
        Government, Pirate
        party 
    Copy: GRECO, Transparency
        International, European
        Commissioner for home affairs (EU
        COM(2011) 308: Fighting
        Corruption in the EU), OSCE,
      OECD,
      WTO, The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)
    
    
      What can be done to improve transparency and fight against corruption
        in Germany?
     
    Summary: Germany has to improve the federal FOI law, adopt FOI laws in 5
      federal states (Bundesländer), ratify CoE and UN conventions against
      corruption, improve transparency of funding of political parties and join
        the Open Government Partnership to catch up with Europe, America,
      OSCE, OECD, G 20 and BRIC states (see appendix
        K: weakness no. 2, 3, 4, 8, 34, 35 and 52 of National Integrity
      Report Transparency Germany).
    
    
    Freedom of Information, Transparency and
      Anti-corruption Treaties in Germany
    
    The human
        right of access to public documents (ICCPR,
      ECHR) is recognized as
      precondition for democracy and essential in the fight against corruption.
    10 years ago development showed (Appendix G: Will
      Germany abandon Freedom of Information? Appendix H: Banana
      Republic Germany), that Germany was least developed in Europe.
    
    Now many countries outside Europe are more advanced then Germany looking at
    transparency and fight of corruption.
    
      - 88 states with approx. 5.5
          billion inhabitants i. e. 78% of the world population give better
        access to information then the federal Freedom of Information Law in
        Germany (http://www.rti-rating.org/country-data/). 
        
 
      - more than 115 states (http://right2info.org/laws)
        with more then 5.9 billion inhabitants
        i. e. 84 % of the worlds population adopted FOI laws or provisions in
        constitutions. 5 German states with half of the population lack FOI
        laws.  
 
      - The UN Convention against Corruption is ratified by more than 159
        states with more then 6,5 billion inhabitants, but not by Germany (Appendix
          A). 
 
      - Germany did not ratify the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption and
        does not follow Recommendation Rec(2003)4 on common rules against
        corruption in the funding of political parties and electoral campaigns
        of the Council of Europe as GRECO (Group of States against Corruption)
        suggested 4 December 2009 (Appendix
          B, Appendix
          C). 
       
      - Germany is the only state in Europe which has not ratified any of
        these to conventions against corruption (Appendix
          D). 
       
    
    GRECO (Group of States against
    Corruption) concludes 29. December 2011 in report Greco RC-III (2011) 9E
    that Germany has implemented or satisfactorily dealt with only four of the
    twenty recommendations contained in the Third Round Evaluation Report (Appendix
      3). Germany has to report on progress 30. June 2012 at the latest. But
    nothing happened up to now.
    
    51 states
    participate in the Open Government Partnership for transparent accountable
    governments. This OGP
        initiative wants governments to commit to openness, participation
      for citizens, fight against corruption and use of new technologies. But
      Germany does not participate, even it would be very necessary.
    
    Germany has to improve the federal FOI law, adopt FOI laws in 5 federal
    states (Bundesländer), ratify CoE and UN conventions against corruption and
    improve transparency of sideline jobs for members of parliaments and funding
    of political parties to catch up with other states in Europe, America, OSCE,
    OECD (see weakness no. 2, 3, 4, 8, 34, 35 and 52 of National Integrity
    Report by Transparency Germany).
    But how does Transparency Germany come to the overall conclusion: Germany
    gets good to very good testimony, concerning anti-corruption prevention and
    repression: ("Insgesamt
      wird Deutschland ein gutes bis sehr gutes Zeugnis zur
      Korruptionsprävention und –repression ausgestellt"). Here is a human
    right missing which is a precondition for democracy.
    
    Therefore I ask for support for these suggestions:
    
      - Letter to UN Human Rights commission because the human right of access
        to public documents is missing in 5 federal states (see Appendix
          1),
 
      - Complaint against refusal of access of the reasons why Bavaria does
        not meat the suggestions of the CoE Human Rights Commissioner (Appendix
          2).
 
    
    UN,
          OSCE and AOS Special Mandates for Protecting Freedom of Expression
          confirmed in Joint Declaration of 6. December 2004,
        that access to information is a human right: (Appendix
          4): 
    
      "The right to access information held by public authorities is a
          fundamental human right which should be given effect at the national
          level through comprehensive legislation (for example Freedom of
          Information Acts) based on the principle
            of maximum disclosure, establishing a presumption that all
          information is accessible subject only to a narrow system of
          exceptions." 
    
    The federal FOI law violates the principle
          of maximum disclosure. 5 federal states violate the human
        right of access to public documents. i. e. no FOI law is adopted.
    The "General Comment No. 34 on Article 19 of the ICCPR" confirms
      this (Appendix
        J):
    "18.  
        Article 19, paragraph 2 embraces a general right of access to
        information held by public bodies. Such information includes all records
        held by a public body, regardless of the form in which the information
        is stored, its source and the date of production."
        "19.   (...) States parties should also enact the
        necessary procedures, whereby one may gain access to information, such
        as by means of freedom of information legislation."
    The UN Human Rights Committee decided that the International Covenant on
      Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) Article 19 (3)
        recognizes the right of individuals and the media to receive state-held
        information without requiring a demonstration of direct interest
      (Appendix L).
    
    The European Court of Human Rights recognizes the human right of access
      to public documents (Appendix
        M). 
    The CoE Human Rights Commissioner suggested to educate administration and
    judges in international law and human rights (Appendix
      E). The refusal to give access to the reason of Bavaria not to follow
    these suggestions (Appendix F), shows
    that this suggestion is important.
    
    
    Regards,
    Walter Keim
    
    Copy: German Institute
        for Human Rights, Menschenrechtszentrum, BMJ, Lehrstuhl für
      Menschenrechtsbildung, Menschenrechtsbeauftragter
        der Bundesregierung, Ausschuss
für
        Menschenrechte und Humanitäre Hilfe
    Appendices:
    
      -  08. April 2011: Freedom
          of Information is missing in the 6. state report of Germany according
          to Article 40 of the Civil Covenant CCPR
        . http://wkeim.bplaced.net/files/foi-ccpr-de.htm 
      - Draft: Can court give access to reason
          why Bavaria refuses to consider the suggestions of the Commissioner of
          Human Right? http://wkeim.bplaced.net/files/vgm-2012.htm
 
      - 29. December 2011 in report Greco RC-III (2011) 9E: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/greco/evaluations/round3/GrecoRC3%282011%299_Germany_EN.pdf
       
    
     
    Result: 
    
      - 21. February 2012: Access Info Europe will draw German NGOs attention
        to the issues raised. 
 
      - X. Baltic Sea NGO Forum (24. April 2012): The
          role of international lawmakers and their respective influence on
          national legislation on information access (pdf)
 
      - June 2012: The German Open Government Online Consultation http://e-konsultation.de/opengov/
        refused the suggestion that Germany
          should join the Open Government Partnership and improve
          access to information according to international standards. Why?
 
      - Keim, Walter (14. July 2012): Administrative Court Munich: Enforcement
          of the Human Right of Access to Information in Bavaria/Germany
 
      - Keim, Walter (14. September 2012): Parallel
          Report to the Human Rights Committee on the occasion of the
          consideration of the Sixth Periodic Report of Germany during the
          Committee’s 106 th Session (15
          October - 2 November 2012), Geneva
 
      - Baltic Sea NGO Forum (18. September 2012): Submission
          for the Sixteenth Session of the Working Group on the Universal
          Periodic Review: Germany published on website of German
          Institute for Human Rights
 
      - November 2012: DIE
          BÜRGERLOBBY (=citizens lobby), LobbyControl
        are interested in fighting corruption
 
      - GRECO (28. Nov. 2012): Non-Compliance Greco RC-III (2012) 15E Interim
        report: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/greco/evaluations/round3/GrecoRC3%282012%2915_Germany_Interim_EN.pdf
 
      - 23. January 2013: Germany submitted
          its national report reviewing its human rights situation to the
        United Nations ignoring access to information problems
 
      - 30 January 2013: Will the Baltic Sea
          NGO Forum participate in the meeting between NGOs and diplomats
        for Germany’s UPR in March 2013 in Geneva?
 
      - Sebastian Haselbeck (4 Feb 2013): German government screws up open
        data: http://opengovgermany.com/2013/02/04/german-government-screws-up-open-data/ 
 
      - German Institute for Human Rights (20 February 2013): As a general
        policy for its participation in the UPR procedure, the German Institute
        for Human Rights will continue to work on the issues it has taken up in
        its own UPR stakeholder report.
 
      - There are 269
          hits (Accessed March 2013) on "Access to Information" in the UPR-Info.org
          database e. g. freedom
          of information laws are mentioned for Canada,
        Azerbaijan,
        Bahrain,
        Botswana,
        Burkina
          Faso, Cape
          Verde, Colombia,
        Cameroon,
        Cuba,
        Equatorial
          Guinea, France,
        Kenya,
        
        Tuvalu,
        Uzbekistan
        and the REPUBLIC
          OF DJIBOUTI submitted by ARTICLE 19. UNESCO
        has recommended Freedom of Information laws to all states reviewed
        during the 16. UPR session.
 
      - UPR
          recommendations to Germany (25. April 2013): Ratification of the
        UN Convention against corruption
 
      -  
          Report of the Working Group on the UPR: A/HRC/WG.6/16/L.7
        [relation to Baltic Sea NGO Forum
          suggestion No.]:
        II. Conclusions and/or recommendations
        123. Responses to the following recommendations will be provided by
        Germany in due time, but no later than the 24th session of the Human
        Rights Council in September 2013:
       
      
        - "123.22: Ratify the United Nations Convention against Corruption
          (Austria);
         
        - 123.28: Withdraw all reservations to human rights instruments to
          which Germany is a party, first of all, to the International Covenant
          on Civil and Political Rights (Russian Federation); [2]
         
        - 123.42: Align its national legislation with international human
          rights standards (Iraq); [indirect 1, 3, approx. 5]
         
        - 123.46: Expand the mandate of the German Institute for Human Rights
          to receiving complaints of human rights violations (India); [7]
         
        - 123.49: Secure proper follow-up to the accepted recommendation from
          the first UPR cycle and introduce tools that will improve the
          effective judicial control over the administrative decisions of the
          Office of Youth called Jugendamt (Poland); [approx. 5]
         
        - 123.145. Introduce independent and effective legal and professional
          supervision of the Youth Office (Jugendamt) and ensure that the
          Jugendamt decisions be in conformity with binding international norms,
          including the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights (Turkey);
          [approx. 3, approx. 4]
         
        - 123.169. Federal and State Governments, in consultation with civil
          society, broaden and intensify existing human rights training in
          schools as well as the routine training of police, security, prison
          and health personnel, and set up a monitoring and evaluation mechanism
          to assess progress (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
          Ireland);" [4]
 
      
    
    
    Published on Internet:
    
      - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNCAC:
        160 states have ratified United Nations Convention against Corruption
        (UNCAC). Germany has not ratified.  
       
      - GRECO Third Evaluation Round (launched in 2007): http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/greco/evaluations/round3/ReportsRound3_en.asp
 
      - 4 Dezember 2009, Evaluierungsbericht über Deutschland zur
        Kriminalisierung der Korruption (SEV Nrn. 173 und 191, Leitlinie 2): http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/greco/evaluations/round3/GrecoEval3(2009)3_Germany_One_DE.pdf
 
      - Lobbypedia - GRECO: http://www.lobbypedia.de/index.php/GRECO
 
      - Report
            Human Rights Commissioner Thomas Hammarberg about his visit in
            Germany 9. – 11. and 15. – 20. October 2006: http://wkeim.bplaced.net/files/Bericht-des-Menschenrechtskommissars.html, Judges
          and administration should be educated in human rights
 
      - 13. December 2011: Application to access documents telling why
        suggestions of Commissioner of Human Rights are refused: http://wkeim.bplaced.net/files/ifg-einsicht.htm
 
      - heise.de: Verabschiedet
sich
          Deutschland vom Informationsfreiheitsgesetz? http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/special/frei/12314/1.html
       
      - heise.de: Bananenrepublik
Deutschland:
          http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/12/12689/1.html
         
      - 21. December 2004: Joint Declaration by the Three Special Mandates for
        Protecting Freedom of Expression   UN, OSCE and OAS: http://merlin.obs.coe.int/iris/2005/2/article1
 
      - "General Comment No. 34 on Article 19 of  the ICCPR"
        (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights): http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/comments.htm
 
      - January 2012, Transparency Germany: - 84 weaknesses in the fight
        against corruption (conventions against Corruption to be ratified,
        improve FOI laws): http://www.gp-f.com/en/ak.php#231
 
      - UN Human Rights Committee decisions: http://right2info.org/cases#section-6
 
      - The European Court of Human Rights cases Article 10 of ECHR:
        http://right2info.org/cases#section-2
          
       
    
    Development:
    
    
      
     
    Visitor No. 
        since 4. January 2012
    [Freedom of
          Information]     [Petitions]    [Human rights]    [Constitutional complaint]    [Homepage] 
    
    This publication is a "hearing": Please send comments to: walter.keim@gmail.com
    Warning: I do not accept any
      liability that the information on these pages is correct, accurate or up
      to date! 
    You may link this page. 
    Dark green: Access to Information Law. Light green: Access
        to Information in constitution only. Yellow: Access to Information Law
        pending
    
    
    
    
    
    Separation of powers in Europe:
    
    
    
    
    
    Defamation in Europe:
    